Rated 2 out of 5 by Jessiebaby Poor quality
Very disappointed in these crops very thin feels cheap and the bottoms way too wide felt disciption presentation not realistic therefore sending them back
August 07, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by Teddybe4r Nice Trousers....but not Kim's greatest...
I have LOADS of Kim's trousers and leggings, from wide leg to fitted - and I love them all.
I'm not so in love with these though. I just don't know why but the fit doesn't seem so "spot-on" in my usual Medium size. I bought these in white. I could clearly see my underwear outline and I could SLIGHTLY see the dark colour of my underwear I was wearing when trying them on.
I think it may be the material I'm not too happy with. I love Kim's thicker material and also like her Brazil Knit fabric....but the Jury is out on this fabric.
I knew they had BACK pockets, but ordered them anyway, as I liked the look of the trousers on the QVC models. Thinking further, I REALLY don't understand at all the PURPOSE of the BACK pockets?? I cannot even IMAGINE wearing these without a longer top to cover my tummy and hips, so, for me, the pockets are entirely needless, as they certainly wouldn't be on show on me!!! They are not even useful either - whereas front pockets are!! I feel you'd have to have a SUPERB figure to have your "rear" on show in such figure-hugging stretch trousers as these!!
4 Stars from me on this one - as it is beautifully constructed with Kim's usual quality workmanship. No fault at all on the pair I received.
Sorry Kim, this is perhaps the one of very few trousers I've had to return.
Thank you QVC for giving me the opportunity to try these, with my WONDERFUL 30-day money back guarantee.
July 25, 2016
Rated 5 out of 5 by rafapop White trousers
Bought these in white at event price am well pleased wish i'd bought more colours i'm 12/14 high st bought medium fits well
July 23, 2016
Rated 3 out of 5 by norrell poor quality
Got these at the reduced price and even with that they are way overpriced... was so disappointed at the poor quality of the material....no structure...soft floppy and easily creased. Well made as expected....but with a cheap fabric....more like something you would buy in a cheap high street shop.
June 19, 2016
Rated 1 out of 5 by Sporty19 Not delux!!
I received these with threads hanging off. Cheap material, shapeless. I am 12/14, medium a bit tight, large may have been better but very disappointed in quality. Jumble sale or charity would put about £2.50 price on them, not Kim quality at all.
June 18, 2016
Rated 5 out of 5 by Sisxx Very comfortable & flattering
Such soft material, stretchy with a slightly relaxed fit. High street 12, got the medium in the poppy. Vibrant colour,great, very satisfied.
June 17, 2016
Rated 1 out of 5 by bramble07 Looked cheap
Very disappointed on receiving these trousers. Looked good on the presentation however they looked awful on. They felt and looked like the old style crimpiline I wore as a child !!!! I hated it then ! The bottom of the trousers were also too wide and just hung there in mid air
Sorry Kim go back to the drawing board with these. I returned them the next day.
June 16, 2016
Rated 3 out of 5 by joyced Thin material
Would not like to pay full price for these, I ordered my usual small and thought they might be too small when I opened them, but they do fit. Could wear round the house, not nice enough to wear out, not often disappointed in Kim's clothes but these a likely to be returned.
June 15, 2016