Rated 1.5 out of 5 by 4
Rated 2 out of 5 by GlamourLady Poor Quality Control
I am usually a size 12 & ordered the size 10: it does fit OK, but is rather over-generous around the waist. The leg length for the regular is very long: I have measured the inside leg as 33", whereas I'm sure on the presentation I watch it was cited as something like 30" or maybe 31".
The finishing off around the button hole is very poor, as it was already fraying the first time I wore them. Overall, the quality control of these jeans seems to be very poor.
January 28, 2017
Rated 1 out of 5 by Biscuitbaker Very Disappointed
I have bought several pairs of Dine Gillman jeans before and have always been delighted, however, these jeans were very different and I have tried 2 pairs now.
The rise was far too short and the change in size of the front pocket just made the jeans crease across the front. As another customer remarked I also had to keep pulling them up. I will not risk another pair of Diane Gillman jeans.
June 02, 2016
Rated 1 out of 5 by Peridot8 Terrible quality
Material very thin, not made well, the waist part of the jean was particularly poorly finished, with threads peeling and elastication looks saggy.
Sizing is off as usual, compared to other size 16 I own from Diane Gilman, these have a very generous fit.
Even at OTO price, I feel ripped off with the quality. Will definitely not be buying anymore jeans from this range!
May 12, 2016
Rated 2 out of 5 by Smiler26 why are sizes so wrong
Ordered this as the short length had sold old as the app didn't update quick enough(as usual) to get
them. Length said 31inches. Having received them yesterday tried them on and they were way too long. I measured them and they were 33 inches long. Why are sizes so inconsistent. I would have been prepared to take them up by 2 inches but 4 would have looked silly. I am sending them back. Its making what should have been a good buy expensive.
May 12, 2016